Archive for September, 2010

professional ability

Saturday, September 25th, 2010

I was skimming through a series of security related sites last week when I came across an article referring to someone described as something like “A Person, M.Inst.ISP, CISM, CISSP, MBCS, CITP, BSc, Director of etc…..” and I found myself wondering what that all actually meant. Yes, I know what the letters stand for, hell I’ve even got a few of them myself, but what do they actually mean in the real world? And because of those letters, would you believe that person knew anywhere near as much about software security as say David Litchfield (Jr), or Charlie Miller, or Thomas Dullien?

Just wondering.

very, very, slow electrons

Tuesday, September 14th, 2010

I recently received an email from my old chum Chris Samuel. Chris emigrated to Australia several years ago, but we still correspond, if infrequently. In fact he sometimes comments here. But he is not good at email.

This is what I received:

On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 03:50:08 am you wrote:

> Have a very Merry Christmas and an exceptionally good New Year.

You too! ;-)

Yes, trying to catch up on some email, and yes I’m crap at it. ;-)

cheers,
Chris

Way to go Chris – nearly eight years late, but you made it. :-)

a graphical web of trust

Sunday, September 12th, 2010

I recently stumbled upon sig2dot, a gpg/pgp keyring graph generator. In fact this seems to have been around for some time, but I’d never come across it before. It can be used to generate a graph of all of the signature relationships in a GPG/PGP keyring, and, like other visualisation tools, this graphical image producing program can give new insight into relationships between objects.

The sig2dot program itself is available in the debian/ubuntu repositories in the package called “signing-party”. But unless you want to install a shed load of other unnecessary cruft along with it (exim? for god’s sake, why?), I recommend you simply pull the perl code direct from the author’s site. Along with the sig2dot program itself, you will need “neato” from the graphviz package and “convert” from the wondrous imagemagick package suite. If you don’t already have those installed then it is pretty safe to pull them from your distro’s package repository.

That done, try the following:

first create an ascii graphviz dot file ready for neato

$ gpg –list-sigs –keyring ~/.gnupg./pubring.gpg | sig2dot.pl > ~/.gnupg/pubring.dot

now convert to a postscipt file

$ neato -Tps ~/.gnupg/pubring.dot > ~/.gnupg/pubring.ps

before using imagmagick to convert to a png graphic

$ convert ~/.gnupg/pubring.ps ~/.gnupg/pubring.png

Those of you with gpg keyrings may wish to try it out (and no. I’m not going to show you mine).

kseniya simonova

Saturday, September 4th, 2010

This has absolutely nothing to do with my usual topics but I make no apology for posting this because the artistry is stunningly beautiful. I was sent a link to Kseniya Simonova’s sand art by a correspondent on a mailing list I subscribe to. Apparently the artist is telling the story of a ukrainian family before, during and after the bombing of their town in the second world war.

I understand that Ms Simonova was a contestant on Ukraine’s version of “Britain’s got talent”. This lady has real talent, unlike some of the contestants I have seen on the UK’s version. It looks as if Ukrainian television may be in a better place than ITV.

it’s not that I’m anti google

Saturday, September 4th, 2010

I’m just pro privacy. And google just happens to be one of the worst offendors when it comes to breaches of my privacy. El Reg yesterday ran an article pointing to the consumerwatchdog.org ad depicting Eric Schmidt as a “privacy pervert”. Deliciously, that ad is hosted on youtube.

But consumerwatchdog have long campaigned about google’s attempts to trample on users’ privacy. The video below shows how google’s chrome browser fails to protect the user’s privacy even when “incognito mode” is used. Incidentally, the video also shows how google’s javascript based, supposedly helpful, “stem searching” capability during searches effectively adds a keystroke sniffer to your PC. Note that this capability is not specific to chrome, it happens whatever browser you use when you use google’s search engine.

Be careful out there.