<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>trivia &#187; free software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baldric.net/category/free-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baldric.net</link>
	<description>another voice in the babble on the net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:17:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ubuntu 10.04 &#8211; minor, and some not so minor, irritations</title>
		<link>http://baldric.net/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-minor-and-some-not-so-minor-irritations/</link>
		<comments>http://baldric.net/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-minor-and-some-not-so-minor-irritations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 17:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[free software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux and unix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips, tricks and howtos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trivial musing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldric.net/?p=553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If and when the teething problems in 10.04 are fixed and the distro looks stable enough to supplant my current preferred version, I will be faced with one or two usability issues. In this version, canonical have taken some design decisions which seem to have some of the fanbois frothing at the mouth. The most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If and when the teething problems in 10.04 are fixed and the distro looks stable enough to supplant my current preferred version, I will be faced with one or two usability issues. In this version, canonical have taken some design decisions which seem to have some of the fanbois frothing at the mouth. The most obvious change in the new &#8220;light&#8221; theme applied is the move of the window control buttons from the top right to the top left (a la Mac OSX). Personally I don&#8217;t find this a problem, but it seems to have started all sorts of religious wars and has apparently even resulted in Mark Shuttleworth being branded as a despot because he had the temerity to suggest that the ubuntu community was not a democracy. Design decisions are taken by the build team, not by polling the views of the great unwashed. In my view that is how it should be. The great beauty of the free software movement is the flexiibility and freedom it gives its users to change anything they don&#8217;t like. Hell, you can even build your own linux distro if you don&#8217;t like any of the (multiple) offerings available. Complaining about a design decision in one distro simply means that the complainant hasn&#8217;t understood the design process, and further, probably doesn&#8217;t understand that if he or she doesn&#8217;t like it, then they are perfectly free to change that decision on their own implementation.</p>
<p>In fact, it is pretty easy to change the button layout. To do so, simply run &#8220;gconf-editor&#8221;  then select <strong>apps -> metacity -> general</strong> from the left hand menu. Now highlight the <strong>button_layout</strong> attribute and change the entry as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>change<br />
close,minimize,maximize:<br />
to<br />
:minimize,maximize,close</p></blockquote>
<p> i.e. move the colon from the right hand end of the line to the left and relocate the close button to the outside. Bingo, your buttons are now back where god ordained they should be and all is right in the universe.</p>
<p>Presentation issues aside, there are some more fundamental design issues which are indicative of a worrying trend. As I noted in the post below, it is now pretty easy to install restricted codecs as and when they are needed. Rhythmbox will happily pull in the codecs needed to play MP3 encoded music with only a minor acknowledgement that the codecs have been deliberately omitted from the shipped distribution for a reason &#8211; the format is closed and patent encumbered. Most users won&#8217;t care about the implications here, but I think it is only right that they should know the implications of using a closed format before accepting it. It is also worth bearing in mind that some software (including that necessary to watch commercial DVDs) is deliberately not shipped because the legal implications of doing so are problematic in many countries.</p>
<p>So, whilst from a usability perspective, I may applaud the decisions which have made it easy for the less technically savvy users to get their multimedia installations up and running with minimal difficulty, I find myself more than a little unhappy with the implications. </p>
<p>But it gets worse. Enter ubuntu one.</p>
<p>Ubuntu one attempts to do for ubuntu what iTunes does for Apple (but without the DRM one hopes&#8230;.). The new service is integrated with rhythmbox and allows users to search for and then pay for music on-line. The big problem here is that the music is all encoded in MP3 format when ubuntu, as a champion of free software, could have chosen the (technically superior) patent free ogg vorbis format. The choice smacks of business &#8220;realpolitick&#8221; in a way that I find disappointing from a company like Canonical. Compare and contrast this approach with the strictly free and open stance taken by Debian and you have to wonder where Canonical is going.  </p>
<p>Watch this space. If they introduce DRM in any form there will be an unholy row. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://baldric.net/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-minor-and-some-not-so-minor-irritations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ubuntu 10.04 problems</title>
		<link>http://baldric.net/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://baldric.net/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 15:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[free software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux and unix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trivial musing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldric.net/?p=548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lastest LTS version of ubuntu (10.04, or lucid lynx according to your naming preferences) was released to an eagerly waiting public on 29 April. Long term support (LTS) versions are supported for three years on the desktop and five years on the server instead of the usual 18 months for the normal releases. My [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lastest LTS version of ubuntu (10.04, or lucid lynx according to your naming preferences) was released to an eagerly waiting public on 29 April. Long term support (LTS)  versions are supported for three years on the desktop and five years on the server instead of the usual 18 months for the normal releases. My current desktop of choice is 8.04 (the previous LTS version) and I will probably move to 10.04 eventually. But not yet.</p>
<p>A wet and windy bank holiday weekend (as this is) meant that my plans to go fishing were put on hold so I downloaded the 10.04 .isos to play with. I grabbed three versions, the 32 and 64 bit desktops and the netbook-remix version. Given that this was a mere day after the release date, I expected a slow response from the mirrors, but I was pleasantly surprised by the download speeds I obtained. Canonical must have put a lot of effort into getting a good range of fast mirrors. The longest download took just over 22 minutes and the fastest came down in just 14 minutes.</p>
<p>I copied the netbook-remix .iso to a USB stick using <a href="http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/">unetbootin</a> on my 8.04 desktop (later versions of ubuntu ship with a usb startup disk creator) and installed to my <a href="http://baldric.net/2009/04/12/acer-aspire-one-a-netbook-experience/">AAO netbook</a> with no hitches whatever. The new theme ditches the bright orange (or worse, brown) colour scheme used in earlier versions of ubuntu and looks attractive and professional.</p>
<div id="attachment_549" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://baldric.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Desk-1_001.png"><img src="http://baldric.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Desk-1_001-300x175.png" alt="UNR 10.04 desktop image" title="Desk 1_001" width="300" height="175" class="size-medium wp-image-549" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">UNR 10.04</p></div>
<p>I spent a short while adding some of my preferred tools and applications and configuring the new installation to handle my multimedia requirements, but all this is now remarkably easy. Even playback of restricted formats (MP3 or AAC audio for example) is eased by the fact that totem (or rhythmbox) will fetch the required codecs for you when first you attempt to play a file which needs them. So, pleasant and easy to use. But I /still/ can&#8217;t get sony memory sticks to work.</p>
<p>But the netbook is simply a (mobile) toy. I do not rely upon it as I do my desktop. Any data on the netbook is ephemeral and (usually) a copy of the same data held elsewhere, either on a server in the case of email, or my main desktop. It would not matter if my installation had trashed the netbook, but my desktop is far more important. It has taken me a long time to get that environment working exactly the way I want it, and there is no way I will update it without a lot of testing first. </p>
<p>I am lucky enough to have a plenty of spare kit around to play with though and I normally test any distro I like the look of in a virtual machine on an old 3.4 GHz dual core pentium 4 I have. Until this weekend, that box was running a 64 bit installation of ubuntu 9.04 with <a href="http://www.virtualbox.org/">virtualbox</a> installed for testing purposes. Running a new distro in a virtual machine is normally good enough to give me a feel for whether I would be happy using that distro long term &#8211; but it does have some limitations and I really wanted to test 10.04 with full access to the underlying hardware so I decided to wipe the test box and install the 64 bit download. If it worked I could then re-install virtualbox and use the new base system as my test rig in future. If it failed, then all I have lost is some time on a wet weekend. It failed.</p>
<p>To be fair, the installation actually worked pretty well.  My problems arose when I started testing my multimedia requirements. I installed all the necessary codecs and libraries (along with libdecss, mencoder, vlc, flash plugins etc, etc) to allow me to waste time watching youtube,  MP4 videos and DVDs only to discover that neither of the DVD/CD devices in my test box were recognised. I could not mount any optical medium. This is a big problem for me because I encode my DVDs to MP4 format so that I can watch them on my PSP on the train. Thinking that there might be a problem with the automounter, I tried manually mounting the devices &#8211; no go, mount failed consistently because it could not find any media. I could not find any useful messages in any of the logs so I checked the ubuntu <a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/">forums</a> to see if others were having any similar problems. Yep &#8211; I&#8217;m not alone. This is a common problem. But it seems that I&#8217;m pretty lucky not to have seen a lot more problems (black, or purple, screen of death seems to be a major complaint). I think I&#8217;ll wait a month or so before trying again.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I guess I can always ask for my money back. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://baldric.net/2010/05/02/ubuntu-10-04-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>psp video revisited</title>
		<link>http://baldric.net/2010/03/21/psp-video-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://baldric.net/2010/03/21/psp-video-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[free software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux and unix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips, tricks and howtos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trivial musing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldric.net/?p=498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I last posted about ripping DVDs to PSP format back in November 2007. Since then I have used a variety of different mechanisms to transcode my DVDs to the MP4 format preferred by my PSP. A couple of years ago I experimented with both winff and a command line front end to ffmpeg called handbrake. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I last posted about <a href="http://baldric.net/2007/11/25/update-to-ripping-dvds-to-a-sony-psp-on-linux/">ripping DVDs to PSP format</a> back in November 2007. Since then I have used a variety of different mechanisms to transcode my DVDs to the MP4 format preferred by my PSP. A couple of years ago I experimented with both <a href="http://code.google.com/p/winff/wiki/UbuntuInstallation">winff</a> and a command line front end to ffmpeg called <a href="http://handbrake.fr/">handbrake</a>. Neither were really as successful as I would have liked (though winff has improved over the past few years) so I usually fell back to the mencoder script that works for 95% of all the DVDs I buy.</p>
<p> I have continually upgraded the firmware on my PSP since 2007 so that I am now running version 6.20 (the latest as at today&#8217;s date). Somewhere between version 3.72 and now, sony decided to stop being so bloody minded about the format of video they were prepared to allow to run on the PSP. We are still effectively limited to mpeg-4/h.264 video wth AAC audio in an mp4 container, but the range of encoding bitrates and video resolutions is no longer as strictly limited as it was back in late 2007.  So when going about converting all the DVDs I received for christmas and my last birthday and considering whether I should I move my viewing habits to take advantage of the power of my N900, I recently revisited my transcoding options.</p>
<p>Despite the attractiveness of the N900&#8242;s media player I concluded that it still makes sense to use the PSP  for several reasons:- it works; the battery lasts for around 7 hours between charges; I have a huge investment in videos encoded to run on it; and most importantly, not using the the N900 as intensively as I use the PSP means that I know that my &#8216;phone will be charged enough to use as a &#8216;phone should I need it. </p>
<p>But whilst revisiting my options I discovered that the latest version of handbrake (0.9.4) now has a rather nice GUI and it will rip and encode to formats usable by both the PSP and a variety of other hand-held devices (notably apple&#8217;s iphone and ipod thingies) quite quickly and efficiently. Unfortunately for me, the latest version is only available as a .deb for ubuntu 9.10 and I am still using 8.04 LTS (because it suits me).  A quick search for alternative builds led me to the <a href="https://launchpad.net/~handbrake-ubuntu/+archive/ppa">ppa site for handbrake</a> which gives builds up to version 0.9.3 for my version of ubuntu.  See below:</p>
<p><a href="http://baldric.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/handbrake.png"><img src="http://baldric.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/handbrake-300x198.png" alt="image of handbrake gui" title="handbrake" width="300" height="198" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-499" /></a></p>
<p>This version works so well on my system that I no longer have to use my mencoder script. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://baldric.net/2010/03/21/psp-video-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>life is too short to use horde</title>
		<link>http://baldric.net/2010/01/23/life-is-too-short-to-use-horde/</link>
		<comments>http://baldric.net/2010/01/23/life-is-too-short-to-use-horde/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[free software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux and unix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail and mail lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips, tricks and howtos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldric.net/?p=446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I own a bunch of different domains and run a mail service on all of them. In the past I have used a variety of different ways of providing mail, from simple pop/imap using dovecot and postfix, through to using the database driven mail service in egroupware. Recently I have consolidated mail for several of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a bunch of different domains and run a mail service on all of them. In the past I have used a variety of different ways of providing mail, from simple pop/imap using <a href="http://baldric.net/upstream-authentication-with-tls-on-postfix/">dovecot and postfix</a>, through to using the database driven mail service in <a href="http://baldric.net/using-postfix-and-dovecot-to-provide-mail-to-egroupware/">egroupware</a>.</p>
<p>Recently I have consolidated mail for several of my domains onto one of my VPSs. I don&#8217;t have a lot of mail users so at first I stuck with the simple approach available to all dovecot/postfix installations, i.e. &#8211; using dovecot as the local delivery mechanism and simply telling postfix to hand off incoming mail to dovecot. Dovecot then has to figure out where to deliver mail. I also used a simple password file for the <a href="http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/PasswordSchemes">dovecot password</a> mechanism. This mechanism worked fine for a small number of users, but it rapidly becomes a pain if you have multiple users across multiple domains and you wish to allow those users to change their passwords remotely. The solution is to move user management to a MySQL backend and change the postfix and dovecot configurations to use that backend database.</p>
<p>Now to allow (virtual) users to change their mail passwords, most on-line documentation points to the sork password module for <a href="http://www.horde.org/">horde</a>. But have you /seen/ horde? Sheesh, what a dog&#8217;s breakfast of overengineered complexity. I flatter myself that I can find may away around most sysadmin problems. but after most of a day one weekend trying to install and configure the entire horde suite  just so that I could use the remote password changing facility I gave up in disgust and went searching for an easier mechanism. Sure enough I found just what I wanted in the shape of <a href="http://postfixadmin.sourceforge.net/">postfixadmin</a>. This is a php application which provides a web based interface for managing mailboxes, virtual domains and aliases on a postfix mail server. </p>
<p>Postfixadmin is easy to install and has few dependencies (beyond the obvious php/postfix/mysql). There are even ubuntu/debian packages available for users of those distributions. I also found an excellent installation howto at <a href="http://rimuhosting.com/knowledgebase/linux/mail/postfixadmin">rimuhosting</a> which I can recommend.  </p>
<p>I can now manage all my virtual domains, user mailboxes and aliases from one single point &#8211; and the users can manage their passwords and vacation messages from a simple web interface. </p>
<div id="attachment_447" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://baldric.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/postfixadmin-admin-create-domain.jpg"><img src="http://baldric.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/postfixadmin-admin-create-domain-300x177.jpg" alt="image of postfixadmin page" title="postfixadmin-admin-create-domain" width="300" height="177" class="size-medium wp-image-447" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">postfixadmin domain creation</p></div>
<p>Whilst I currently only provide pop3s/imaps mail access through dovecot, postfixadmin offers a <a href="http://squirrelmail.org/">squirrelmail</a> plugin to integrate webmail should I wish to do that in future.</p>
<p>Simple, elegant and above all, usable. And it didn&#8217;t take all day to install either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://baldric.net/2010/01/23/life-is-too-short-to-use-horde/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>tor server compromise</title>
		<link>http://baldric.net/2010/01/22/tor-server-compromise/</link>
		<comments>http://baldric.net/2010/01/22/tor-server-compromise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[free software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network (in)security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldric.net/?p=441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to this post by Roger Dingledine, two tor directory servers were compromised recently. In that post Dingledine said: In early January we discovered that two of the seven directory authorities were compromised (moria1 and gabelmoo), along with metrics.torproject.org, a new server we&#8217;d recently set up to serve metrics data and graphs. The three servers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Jan-2010/msg00161.html">this</a> post by Roger Dingledine, two tor directory servers were compromised recently. In that post Dingledine said:</p>
<blockquote><p>In early January we discovered that two of the seven directory authorities were compromised (moria1 and gabelmoo), along with metrics.torproject.org, a new server we&#8217;d recently set up to serve metrics data and graphs. The three servers have since been reinstalled with service migrated to other servers.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Whilst the direrctory servers apparently also hosted the tor project&#8217;s svn and git source code repositories, Dingledine is confident that the source code has not been tampered with &#8211; and nor has there been any possible compromise of user anonymity. Neverthless, the project recommends that tor users and operators upgrade to the latest version. Good advice I&#8217;d say &#8211; I&#8217;ve just upgraded mine. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://baldric.net/2010/01/22/tor-server-compromise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OSS shouldn&#8217;t frighten the horses</title>
		<link>http://baldric.net/2009/11/11/oss-shouldnt-frighten-the-horses/</link>
		<comments>http://baldric.net/2009/11/11/oss-shouldnt-frighten-the-horses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[free software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux and unix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trivial musing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baldric.net/?p=355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since I first read that Nokia were adding much needed telephony capability to their N8x0 range of internet tablets I have been watching the development of the new Nokia N900 with much interest. It looks to be potentially the sort of device I would buy. Despite all the hype around the iPhone, I really dislike [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I first read that Nokia were adding much needed telephony capability to their N8x0 range of internet tablets I have been watching the development of the new <a href="http://maemo.nokia.com/n900/">Nokia N900</a> with much interest. It looks to be potentially the sort of device I would buy.  Despite all the hype around the iPhone, I really dislike Apple&#8217;s proprietary approach to locking in its customers and I hate even more its use of DRM.  So the emergence of a device which uses Linux based software such as <a href="http://maemo.org/">Maemo</a> and which is obviously targetted at the iPhone&#8217;s market looks to me to be very interesting. But some of the advertising is starting to look scary&#8230;.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WxiOKKF721U&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WxiOKKF721U&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>(I still want one though.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://baldric.net/2009/11/11/oss-shouldnt-frighten-the-horses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
